Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Fuck U(IP)

I am a fan of Spike Lee’s films, and so I was understandably excited to see his latest work, Inside Man. I even booked tickets online and went to the 11.50 pm sneak preview screening at GV Marina last Saturday, April 1, 2006.

Once the film started, I was appalled to discover that all the expletives had been muted. This was not done in an unobtrusive way; there was no way anyone could fail to see that, especially in all the close-ups. I had a horrible experience because this was incredibly distracting, and it completely marred my enjoyment of the film. If you don’t think this is so, just try leaving gaps in your speech when you talk and see if you can follow yourself easily.

I discovered through a search on the internet that the MDA had originally classified the film as NC-16 for language. Later, there was another version submitted, which had been edited (presumably for the expletives) and passed under PG.

It was apparent that the blame for this lies solely on the shoulders of the distributor, United International Pictures Singapore. Having had a choice between an age-limited rating and one without, they chose commit artistic rape on the the film and go for the choice that could get them more money, in their opinion.

I understand that sometimes films like these have to be toned down for general consumption. For example, it is routine that these cleaned-up versions play on national TV or on airlines. However, there is a real possibility that kids will be watching in these situations, because they are free-to-air and easily accessible.

One must stop and consider: How many kids under 16 are watching this film in theatres anyway? The stars are Denzel Washington, Jodie Foster and Clive Owen, not exactly your teenybopper idol type. It is a smart heist movie, which requires thought and analysis, something that the typical young teen doesn’t rate very highly on his list of must-haves for a movie. And true enough, at the screening that I attended, none of the audience was under 16.

Taking all these into consideration, United International Pictures Singapore has undoubtedly made a wrong decision. They decided to have an edited version play in cinemas in order to tap the under-16 demographic, when in reality that demographic doesn’t even want to see the movie in the first place.

In the process, they have rendered the film unwatchable, insulted director Spike Lee by doing this, and more importantly, insulted the entire audience. This is completely unacceptable.

I urge the company to withdraw all prints of the PG-rated version and replace them with the NC-16 rated one. I also feel strongly that UIP needs to apologize to everyone who has been subjected to this torture and issue them with replacement tickets.

Let’s hope integrity still exists in this world.

I sent this to all the papers in Singapore. Who knows if they'll publish it? But yeah, Inside Man is a damn good heist movie. A much more eloquent (sans the rant above) review here. I'm too tired to write more. Apologies to Tim for stealing.

4 Comments:

At 4:36 PM, April 14, 2006, Blogger Andy Levy said...

Hey there. You should know that when a film is edited for television or for airplanes, it's in the Directors Guild of America's contract that the director has to be given the opportunity to make the cuts himself. (In otherwords, directors can decline to do so, but if they want to, the studio must let them.)

I'm trying to remember what the DGA rule is for overseas distribution, but I'm drawing a blank. (I used to work at the DGA.) However, I find it hard to believe that the DGA would allow a distributor to change a film in any way without the director's approval, so it very well might be that Spike knows exactly what happened to Inside Man.

Then again, I could be wrong, or the distributor could've violated the DGA's Basic Agreement and dropped out the expletives without Spike's knowledge or approval.

I'd be interested to know if you find anything out.

PS - You might want to go to dga.org and see if there's an online copy of the Creative Rights Handbook there. That would probably have the relevant sections of the Basic Agreement in it.

Good luck (and good night),

The Cranky Insomniac

 
At 5:05 PM, April 14, 2006, Blogger cinewhore said...

Well, the Creative Rights Handbook on the DGA website states that

If the Producer wants to change a motion picture for distribution or videodiscs or videocassettes, basic cable, or in-flight, you must edit the new version or be consulted about the changes the same as you would edit or be consulted in connection with changes for television.

Anyway I tried searching for the contact info of Spike Lee's production company online but drew a blank as far as email addresses or websites went. If you any information on that it'd be much appreciated. Or perhaps you could pass the word, if you knew the guy?

I'd love to see a lawsuit. Haha.

 
At 9:23 PM, April 14, 2006, Blogger Andy Levy said...

I can't say that I've ever dealt with Spike. I did find his agent's phone number, if that helps...
http://webcfapps.directorsguild.org/directory/search_details.cfm?DGAKey=460271

 
At 9:27 PM, April 14, 2006, Blogger cinewhore said...

I can't get anywhere with that link. Ah well.

 

gimme some mindfuckery

<< Home