My Three Choices
On Sunday, for the Eye é City photo thingy, I had to choose three for the final selection out of the thirty-six I submitted that night.
Here are my selections.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e33a9/e33a921b8e0302bb8f0e3163c47ef79031bbd968" alt="Window & Door"
Choices
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ddc5/4ddc54490d10a661675906a3a7e1b841cebd7dff" alt="Marshall Road"
Marshall Road
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b72/f7b72444673b7fdbd05031ed6d123a57d1ec14c3" alt="Wheelbarrow"
Promise
I was also forced to give them pretentious-sounding titles like the ones above.
But the worst thing was that I had to write down what the meaning behind the pictures were. Now, being a veteran of literature and film analysis classes, I have no problem spinning the requisite bullshit. What I have a problem with is forcing the viewer to accept only one viewpoint. Because I took the picture, I am assumed to have absolute authority over it. If I say that this is the meaning behind the picture, I have essentially negated any other readings of it in one fell swoop. This goes against everything I believe in with regards to art and literature.
How can there be only one reading of a work? We should all be free to draw our own associations and interpretations. To be told what to think of something is, quite simply, authoritarian.
But well, I did it anyway. They wanted me to spin, and spin I did. Oh what bullshit I spun. After which I promptly felt disgusted and ashamed of myself. Principles? Bah. Thrown away like cigarette butts.
Here are my selections.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e33a9/e33a921b8e0302bb8f0e3163c47ef79031bbd968" alt="Window & Door"
Choices
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ddc5/4ddc54490d10a661675906a3a7e1b841cebd7dff" alt="Marshall Road"
Marshall Road
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b72/f7b72444673b7fdbd05031ed6d123a57d1ec14c3" alt="Wheelbarrow"
Promise
I was also forced to give them pretentious-sounding titles like the ones above.
But the worst thing was that I had to write down what the meaning behind the pictures were. Now, being a veteran of literature and film analysis classes, I have no problem spinning the requisite bullshit. What I have a problem with is forcing the viewer to accept only one viewpoint. Because I took the picture, I am assumed to have absolute authority over it. If I say that this is the meaning behind the picture, I have essentially negated any other readings of it in one fell swoop. This goes against everything I believe in with regards to art and literature.
How can there be only one reading of a work? We should all be free to draw our own associations and interpretations. To be told what to think of something is, quite simply, authoritarian.
But well, I did it anyway. They wanted me to spin, and spin I did. Oh what bullshit I spun. After which I promptly felt disgusted and ashamed of myself. Principles? Bah. Thrown away like cigarette butts.
3 Comments:
hey, i liked the one with the jetty and the clouds! why u din choose dat wan lah?
yeah i agree with The Visitor...
Tat's my fav too! the jetty and the clouds!
anyway, congrats! hopefully urs get to the 100 selected ones...
how's kiwi's luck this year?
-ww
Um. 'Cos I liked these better? The jetty made my top 5, but not top 3...
gimme some mindfuckery
<< Home